Glass Tableware: India vs Cambodia
For brands sourcing glass tableware, here's how India stacks up against Cambodia on the factors that actually move your margin — cost, duty, speed and risk.
Cost index: 100 = India baseline. Figures are directional benchmarks from our factory network, DGFT and USITC data — refreshed monthly on the Live Export Index.
Where Cambodia is strong
- Very low apparel cost
- Duty preferences to the EU
Where it falls short
- Narrow to garments
- Small capacity
- Compliance scrutiny
The verdict
India wins on glass tableware
For glass tableware, India combines a 16% cost advantage over China with Firozabad's craft heritage, lower tariff exposure and a transparent, English-speaking supply chain. Cambodia may suit narrow use-cases, but lacks the heritage depth and category breadth India offers.
Source glass tableware from FirozabadCompare glass tableware with other countries
Buyer FAQ
Glass Tableware: India vs Cambodia — FAQs
- For Glass Tableware, India runs roughly 16% below comparable China landed cost, and our cost index puts Cambodia about -8% versus the India baseline of 100. The gap widens once tariff exposure and India's RoDTEP refund are included.
- Indian-origin Glass Tableware avoids the Section-301-style penalties that fall on Chinese goods, and benefits from India's expanding network of trade agreements. Always confirm HS 7013 classification for your destination market.
- India offers 35–55 day production lead times, deep craft heritage, and a transparent, English-speaking supply chain — reducing the concentration risk of a single-country sourcing base.
- Yes. We manage sampling, QC, freight and documentation end-to-end, typically from Firozabad, so you can run a parallel pilot before shifting volume — no flights required.
Make the switch to India for glass tableware.
We handle sourcing, QC, freight and documentation end-to-end. You stay focused on growing the brand.